Evidence & Community Voices

Research, lived examples, and partner influence help explain why practice, feedback, and community connection matter. These are reference points and inspirations, not claims that RISE has already produced these outcomes.

Jimmy Lee Langhoff

Jimmy Lee Langhoff and A Queen’s Conversation

Long before RISE had a name, Jimmy Lee Langhoff’s work through A Queen’s Conversation showed how powerful a prepared conversation can be. His clients describe interview coaching that helped them find their voice, understand their why, receive direct feedback, and practice before a high-pressure room.

RISE carries that lesson forward in a different setting. The point is not to claim someone else’s results. The point is to honor a community example that helped shape the belief behind RISE: confidence grows when people are challenged, encouraged, prepared, and seen.

What Jimmy’s clients say about his coaching

Kimberly Stommes said Jimmy helped her “find YOU” and “effectively convey your best self” in the interview process.

Elle Smith described coaching that “gave it to me straight” with “constructive feedback” tailored to her personality and strengths.

Allison Cook pointed to an “in-person panel mock interview” and said Jimmy’s interview approach helped her “communicate more effectively.”

Community voice sources: Kimberly Stommes testimonial, Elle Smith testimonial, and Allison Cook testimonial from A Queen’s Conversation.

What the evidence shows.

Across multiple populations and service settings, structured job-search support is most useful when it combines practical skills, self-presentation, individualized feedback, clear goals, and social support. That evidence informs the RISE model; it is not RISE outcome data.

2.67x

Higher odds of obtaining employment

A meta-analysis of 47 experimental and quasi-experimental job-search interventions found substantially higher employment odds for participants. Stronger programs combined skills, self-presentation, self-efficacy, proactivity, goals, and social support.

Liu, Huang, and Wang meta-analysis
+22 points

Learning-focused workshops can change behavior

One randomized workshop study reported a 22-percentage-point reemployment difference after eight weeks and stronger job-search intentions and behavior. The Department of Labor rates the specific reemployment comparison as low-confidence because of follow-up attrition.

U.S. DOL CLEAR study profile
$7,133

Intensive workforce services increased earnings

In the national WIA Gold Standard Evaluation, customers offered core plus intensive services earned $7,133 more over 30 months than customers offered core services alone. Employment at quarter 10 was 79% versus 75%.

U.S. Department of Labor evaluation
High evidence

Structured interview practice improved employment

A randomized trial of virtual interview training for autistic transition-age youth found participants significantly more likely to be employed six months later. CLEAR rates the causal evidence high, while noting the small, specific study population.

U.S. DOL CLEAR study profile
78.6% vs. 44.4%

Interview rehearsal showed promise

In a small randomized trial involving job seekers with substance-use disorders, 78.6% of virtual interview trainees attained a competitive or volunteer position within six months, compared with 44.4% receiving usual services.

Peer-reviewed randomized trial
OR 3.76

Practice also mattered in reentry services

A 2025 randomized trial found that adding virtual job-interview training to prison employment services increased the odds of employment within six months and shortened time to employment. Results apply to that reentry setting and should not be generalized automatically.

National Institute of Justice summary
How to read this evidence: These findings come from different programs, populations, and delivery models. They support structured, skill-based, individualized workforce preparation, but they do not prove that every program will produce the same results. RISE will report its own participation and outcome data separately as the program develops.